“No Comms, No Backup, No Problem” — What a US General Said About the SAS Being “Built Different”

January 1991, the western desert of Iraq. The sand stretched to the horizon in every direction, flat and empty and cold in a way most people never imagine a desert could be. Temperatures dropped below freezing at night and the wind cut through clothing like a blade. Somewhere out in that darkness, hidden among the Wadis and the Scrubland, Iraqi military crews were loading Scud missiles onto mobile launchers, aiming them at Tel Aviv, and firing them into the night sky.

 Each launch lit up the desert floor with a blinding flash of orange and white, followed by a  deep rumble that rolled across the sand like thunder. And those missiles were about to destroy something far more important  than buildings. They were about to destroy the coalition that had taken months to build. This is the story of how a small group of SAS soldiers went  deep into Iraqi held territory with no reliable communications, no backup, and no  safety net.

 And how what they did out there made a skeptical American general admit these men were simply built different. The problem was not just military. It was political and the clock was running. Somewhere in a windowless  office in Riyad, American diplomats were burning through phone lines to Jerusalem, begging the Israelis to hold fire.

Because when Saddam Hussein invaded Kuwait in August 1990, Washington had done something extraordinary. It had assembled a coalition of over 30  nations, including Arab countries like Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and Syria, all united against Iraq. But that coalition was fragile. It held together because of one very careful agreement.

 Israel, despite being threatened by Saddam, would stay out of the war. If Israel got pulled in,  the Arab nations would be forced to choose between fighting alongside Israel or walking away. Everyone knew they would walk away. The coalition would collapse and the entire operation to free Kuwait would fall apart. Saddam knew this too.

That is exactly why he started launching scuds at Israel. He did not expect the missiles to win the war. He expected them to provoke Israel into striking back. And it nearly worked. In the first weeks of the air campaign, Iraqi mobile Scud launchers fired missile after missile  toward Israeli cities.

The people of Tel Aviv huddled in sealed rooms wearing gas masks, terrified that the next warhead might carry chemical weapons. The Israeli government was furious. Their military was ready to launch a full-scale response. War and American diplomats were working around the clock to hold them back. Every new Scud launch made that job harder.

 The coalition  commander, General Norman Schwarzoff, had a plan for the war, and it did not include chasing Scud launchers around  the desert. He believed in overwhelming air power. He had hundreds of the most advanced aircraft in the world at his disposal, and he was certain they could handle the Scud problem from the sky.

 He sent sorty after sorty over the western Iraqi desert, hunting for the mobile launchers. But the launchers were almost impossible to find. They were small, they moved constantly, and Iraqi crews had become experts at hiding them under bridges, in culverts, and beneath camouflage netting. Pilots would fly over a grid square and report it clear.

 And within hours, a Scud would launch from that exact spot. And the desert was simply too vast and the targets were too small. Air power alone was not working. And everyone at Central Command knew it, even if no one wanted to say it out loud. Schwartzkov was not a fan of special forces. He had seen them used poorly in past operations, and he felt they created complications without delivering results.

 He wanted a clean, conventional war dominated by air strikes and followed by a massive ground assault. The idea of sending small teams of men hundreds of kilome into hostile territory with limited support and no guarantee of extraction struck him as reckless and unnecessary. He pushed back hard against any plan that involved special operations in the western desert.

 But there was one man in the coalition who saw things very differently. that British General Sir Peter Deabilier was the senior British military commander in the Gulf and he had a background that set him apart from almost every other general in the theater. Before he became a general, Deabilier had served in the special air service.

 He had commanded SAS operations in  Oman, Aiden, and the jungles of Borneo in some of the most remote and hostile environments on Earth. He knew exactly what these men  were capable of because he had once been one of them. Deabilier looked at the Scud problem and saw something that Schwartzkov did not. He saw a mission that was tailorade for the SAS.

 The western desert was enormous. Yes, but the SAS had trained for exactly this kind of environment. They specialized in long range desert operations. They could move in small, fast groups, live off minimal supplies, or navigate without roads, and operate for weeks without contact with headquarters. Where conventional forces saw an impossible landscape, Deabilier saw home ground.

 He began pushing his case up the chain of command. He argued that the SAS could do what the aircraft could not. They could get eyes on the ground in the Scud launch zones. They could find the launchers, call in air strikes with precision, and even destroy them directly. More than that, they could cut the communication lines that linked Baghdad to the western launch sites, throwing the entire Scud operation into chaos.

 It was a bold proposal, and it met fierce resistance. Schwartzkov was skeptical. Other senior American commanders questioned whether a few dozen British soldiers could make any real difference in a theater that stretched across thousands of square km. But Delabilier had something that skepticism could not easily overcome. He had credibility.

 He was not some staff officer pushing theory from a headquarters tent. He was a man who had walked behind enemy lines himself, who had lived in the dirt and made life and death decisions with no one watching. When he said the SAS could do this, people who knew his record listened and slowly, reluctantly, the approval came through.

It was not enthusiastic. It came with caveats and limitations. But it came. The SAS was going into the Western Desert of Iraq. What happened next would silence every skeptic in the room, quietly rewrite the rule book on special forces in modern warfare, and draw a sharp line between the men who followed the plan and the men who survived when the plan fell apart.

 The first men went in on foot, small patrols of eight, and inserted by helicopter deep into Iraq, carrying everything they needed on their backs. The second wave went in on wheels, mobile fighting columns. These were groups of heavily armed Land Rovers and motorcycle outr rididers moving across the desert like small armies carrying their own fuel, water, ammunition, and supplies for weeks of independent operations.

Both approaches had the same mission. Find the Scud launchers, destroy them, or call in air strikes, and cut the communication lines between Baghdad and the western launch sites. But the desert would treat these two approaches very differently. and the men who chose to go on foot would pay a terrible price for it.

The most famous foot patrol was called Bravo 20. Eight men from B Squadron were inserted by helicopter on the night of January 22nd, 1991 northwest of Baghdad. But their mission was to set up a hidden observation post and report on Scud movements. They carried roughly 95 kg of equipment per man. The plan was simple.

Get in, hide, watch, report, and get out. But almost nothing went as planned. The terrain offered no cover. Within hours, they were compromised, and they had no choice but to run for the Syrian border on foot over a 100 km to the northwest in bitter winter conditions. Three of them died, four were captured and subjected to brutal interrogation and torture.

 Only one, Chris Ryan, made it across the border after what he described as nearly 300 km of walking over 8 days with almost no water. It remains one of the longest claimed escape and evasion marches in SAS history. But the tragedy of Bravo 20 has overshadowed a much more important story. While that foot patrol was falling apart in the north, the mobile fighting columns of A and D squadron were tearing through the western desert with devastating effectiveness.

These columns were built around heavily modified Land Rover 110s known within the regiment as dinkies fitted with Browning50 caliber heavy machine guns, GPMGs, Mark 19 grenade launchers, and Milan anti-tank missile systems. The squadrons had trained for exactly this kind of operation in the United Arab Emirates before deploying, rehearsing column movement, desert navigation, and rapid contact drills until the procedures were second nature.

 Each column typically moved with a dozen or more vehicles. Sometimes supported by motorcycle scouts who ranged ahead to check routes and spot enemy  positions. They carried enough fuel and water to operate independently for days. And when supplies ran low, the regiment created its own solution. A temporary formation called E Squadron, an SASrun resupply convoy of 10 trucks and a heavily armed Land Rover escort, drove to a rendevous point roughly 140 km inside Iraq to meet the fighting  columns.

Even the logistics were done behind enemy lines by their own people. The columns moved mostly at night, navigating by map, compass, and the stars, aided by early GPS receivers that only worked when the satellites were overhead, crossing terrain that most conventional commanders considered impossible.

 The desert floor was a mix of hard gravel planes, soft sand that could swallow a vehicle up to its axles, and deep waddies that carved through the landscape like scars. The wind blew constantly, carrying fine dust that got into engines, weapons, and lungs. Temperatures swung wildly from above 30° C during the day to well below zero at night.

 The men wrapped themselves in every layer they had and still shivered through the dark hours, hands numb on their weapons, eyes scanning the horizon for Iraqi patrols. Their first major objective was the Iraqi communications network. Buried beneath the desert floor ran a series of fiber optic cables that connected Baghdad directly to the military commands in the western launch zones.

 These cables were Saddam’s lifeline to his Scud crews. Without them, he could not coordinate launches, pass intelligence, or issue orders in real time, and the SAS columns located these cables, dug them up, and destroyed them with explosives. The effect was immediate and dramatic. With the fiber optic network cut, Iraqi military commanders in the west were forced to switch to radio communications.

And the moment they did, coalition signals intelligence units already listening across every frequency could hear everything. Targets that had been invisible suddenly had voices. Launch orders that had been undetectable were now being intercepted in real time. It was as if someone had turned the lights on in a dark room.

 The columns did not stop at communications. They began actively hunting Scud launchers, moving into the launch zones and engaging Iraqi crews directly. When they found a launcher, they either destroyed it themselves with Milan missiles and heavy machine gun fire or called in air strikes from coalition aircraft circling overhead.

 The combination of ground eyes and air power was exactly what Deabilier had promised. Pilots who had spent weeks searching the empty desert for targets were suddenly being guided onto precise coordinates by men who could see the launches with their own eyes. The Iraqi response was fierce but disorganized. Enemy patrols began sweeping the desert and several times the SAS columns found themselves in running firefights with Iraqi vehicles and infantry.

 But the columns were fast, heavily armed and aggressive. They did not hide and wait to be found. They moved constantly, struck hard, and disappeared before the Iraqis could mount a coordinated response. In one engagement, into an SAS column, destroyed multiple Iraqi vehicles in a matter of minutes and withdrew before reinforcements could arrive.

The desert, which had seemed like a trap to the foot patrols, was a playground for the mobile columns. They had space to maneuver, speed to disengage, and firepower to punch through anything short of an armored battalion. Back at coalition headquarters, the reports coming in from the Western Desert were starting to change minds.

The Scud launches from the Western sector were dropping. The communications network was in ruins. Iraqi forces were being pulled from other positions to deal with what they believed was a much larger force operating behind their lines. Schwartzkov, who had resisted the entire idea, was beginning to see results that he could not argue with.

 The SAS had not just carried out their mission. They had done it with a handful of men, a few dozen vehicles, and almost no support infrastructure deep inside enemy territory where no help was coming if things went  wrong. And things had gone wrong many times. But the columns kept moving, kept fighting, and kept delivering results that the most advanced air force in history had struggled to achieve on its own.

 Quick pause. If these stories matter to you, you’re already part of what we’re building here. If you haven’t yet, subscribe to Battle of Britain’s stories so we can keep telling the human side of this chapter of history. Cheers. Back to it. Before the SAS entered the Western  Desert, Scud launches against Israel were happening almost every day.

Iraqi crews had the freedom to move, set up,  fire, and disappear before coalition aircraft could respond. The mobile launchers were winning the cat-and- mouse game against the largest concentration of air power since the Second World War. But once the SAS columns  began operating in the launch zones, everything changed.

 Scud launches  from the western sector dropped sharply. Some weeks saw no launches at all from areas where the SAS were active. The exact numbers  remain classified in parts. Anne and both British and American sources have debated the precise figures for decades, but the trend was unmistakable.

 The Scuds were being suppressed and the men on the ground were the reason why. The impact went far beyond destroyed launchers. The intelligence windfall from the severed fiber optic cables was still paying dividends weeks later with coalition analysts intercepting  every order and position report that Iraqi commanders were now forced to send by radio.

 But the SAS columns were already causing a different kind of damage. The Iraqi response grew more desperate and more aggressive as the weeks wore on. The soldiers hunting the SAS through the darkness were in many cases conscripts. Young men shivering in the same cold, following orders from a command structure that was falling apart around them.

 But Saddam’s commanders had realized that something was operating deep in their rear area, and they  began diverting significant military resources to find it. Infantry units, armored vehicles, and even helicopter patrols were pulled from other positions and sent into the wastess to hunt down the SAS columns. This was exactly the kind of chaos that De Laier had hoped for.

 Every Iraqi soldier sent to chase ghosts in the desert was a soldier who was not defending the front lines against the coming ground assault. The SAS, numbering perhaps a few hundred men at most, were tying down thousands of Iraqi troops simply by existing in the wrong place at the wrong time. But the Desert War was not a clean or comfortable thing.

 The men in the fighting columns lived in conditions that would break most people within days. They slept on the ground beside their vehicles, wrapped in sleeping bags that were never warm enough, waking every few hours to check their perimeter or move to a new position. Water was rationed carefully. Food was cold rations eaten in darkness because any light could give away their position. The wind never stopped.

 It carried a fine dust that coated everything, clogging weapon mechanisms, grinding into eyes  and teeth and turning every breath into an effort. The vehicles took constant punishment from the terrain. Tires blew out on sharp rocks. Engines overheated during the  day and refused to start in the bitter pre-dawn hours.

 Suspension components  cracked under the weight of weapons and supplies. The men became mechanics as much as soldiers, repairing their vehicles with whatever they had. I’d sometimes cannibalizing parts from one Land Rover to keep  another running. The firefights were sudden and violent. The desert might be empty for hours, nothing but  flat gravel and silence, and then a column would crest a low ridge and find itself face to face with an  Iraqi patrol.

 Engagements happened at ranges that left no time for planning. Machine guns opened up from vehicle mounts. The deep hammering sound rolling across the open ground. Tracer rounds drew bright lines through the darkness. Red and green streaking in both directions. Milan missiles launched with a sharp crack and a trail of white smoke, slamming into Iraqi trucks and armored cars with a flash that lit up the desert for 100 meters in every direction.

 Men shouted over the noise, calling targets, directing fire, coordinating movement, and then almost as quickly as it started, it was over. Within minutes, the columns would pull back,  regroup, check for casualties, and vanish into the darkness before Iraqi reinforcements could arrive. Some of those knights left marks that the men would  carry for the rest of their lives.

 On more than one occasion, SAS columns were nearly encircled by Iraqi forces that had tracked their movements. Extraction under fire became a skill practiced not in  training, but in real time with real bullets snapping past. Helicopters were called in for emergency resupply and casualty evacuation. Flying low and fast over enemy territory  with no escort, guided in by infrared strobes that only showed up through night vision equipment.

 Pilots later described those flights as some of the most dangerous missions of the entire war. The weaving between Iraqi  air defense positions to reach men who had no other way out. Meanwhile, coalition air power was finally  becoming effective in the western desert. And the reason was the SAS. Before the ground teams arrived, pilots had been flying blind, searching an area the size of a small country for targets the size of a bus.

 Now they had men on the ground feeding them precise coordinates, marking targets with lasers and confirming kills in real time. The partnership between the SAS columns and the aircraft overhead became one of the most successful airground operations  of the entire Gulf War. Aircraft that had wasted dozens of sorties searching empty desert were now destroying confirmed targets on nearly every mission.

 The efficiency was staggering and it made the case for groundbased forward observation in a way that no amount of pre-war theory ever could. The effect on Israeli politics was just as significant. As Scud launches declined, the pressure on the Israeli government to retaliate eased. American diplomats who had been working around the clock to keep Israel out of the war finally had something concrete to point to.

 The threat was being handled. The coalition held together. The Arab nations stayed in the fight, and the ground assault, when it finally came in late February, hit an Iraqi military that had already been weakened, disrupted, and distracted by weeks of SAS operations in its rear. General Schwartzoff, the man who had resisted deploying special forces from the very beginning, could no longer deny what had happened.

 And the SAS had gone into the most hostile environment imaginable with a fraction of the resources available to conventional forces. And they had achieved results that changed the course of the campaign. They had done it without a massive logistics chain, without armored support, without air superiority over their own positions, and often without reliable communications  back to headquarters.

 When their radios failed, they adapted. When their vehicles broke down, they fixed them. When they were outnumbered, they fought through. General Schwartzkov, the man who had resisted the entire operation, gave the SAS his personal commendation and told  colleagues that British special forces were second to none. He never used the words built different.

 That phrase came later, but the meaning was exactly the same. You’re a man who had distrusted special forces for his entire career. Watched a handful of British soldiers do what the most advanced air campaign in history could not. And he changed his mind. That is as close to built different as a four-star general will ever get.

 The western desert of Iraq, once dismissed as an empty wasteland too vast to control, had become the proving ground for a new kind of warfare. And the men who proved it were already preparing to vanish the way they always did, leaving behind a battlefield that looked untouched, but had been utterly transformed. By the time the ceasefire came on February 28th, 1991, the men who crossed back into Saudi Arabia were barely recognizable.

 They were thinner, exhausted, sunburned, and windburned in equal measure. Their uniforms bleached pale by the sun and stiff with dust that had worked its way into every fiber. They looked like men who had been living on another planet. In many ways, they had been. The western desert of Iraq had been their world for weeks.

 A world stripped of every comfort and support system that modern soldiers depend on. And they had not just survived in it, they had owned it. The homecoming was quiet by design. The SAS does not hold press conferences. There were no interviews, no victory laps, no book deals in those first weeks. The regiment returned to its base at Heraford in England, debriefed behind closed doors, and began the long process of documenting what had happened and what could be learned.

 The lessons were enormous. The Gulf War had proven beyond any doubt that small, not highly trained special forces teams could achieve strategic results far beyond their size. A few hundred men in Land Rovers had suppressed an entire missile campaign, disrupted enemy communications across a theater of war, and tied down thousands of Iraqi troops who were desperately needed elsewhere.

 The regiment lost four soldiers. The entire campaign, weeks of operations deep inside Iraq, cost four lives. The SAS received 55 medals for gallantry and meritorious service. No amount of pre-war planning had predicted that outcome. No simulation had modeled it. It had happened because a group of men were given an impossible task and found a way to do it anyway.

 The legacy of the SAS campaign in Western Iraq reshaped military thinking across the Western world. Before the Gulf War, special forces were often seen as a sideshow, useful for hostage rescues and small raids, but not serious players in large-scale conventional warfare. Schwarzoff himself had embodied that view, and he was far from alone.

 Many senior commanders in both the American and British militaries saw special operations as unpredictable, hard to control, and not worth the risk. The Western Desert changed that perception permanently. Within the British military, the Gulf War ended any remaining debate about the regiment’s strategic value.

 The SAS’s operational mandate expanded significantly in the years that followed, and the regiment became central  to British deployments in the Balkans. Sierra Leone and eventually Afghanistan and Iraq. After 1991, every major coalition operation placed special forces at the center of the campaign, not the edges.

 The model that the SAS had proven in Iraq, e small mobile teams operating deep in hostile territory with air support and signals intelligence became the template for a new era of warfare. The Americans expanded and restructured their own special operations command. In the years that followed, pouring billions into capabilities across Delta Force, the Navy Seals, and the Army’s special forces groups, much of that expansion was built on lessons that came directly from what the SAS had done in the Iraqi desert.

General Sir Peter Deilier, the man who had fought so hard to get the SAS into the war, retired from the British Army shortly after the conflict. He had spent the most significant years of his career in special operations and the Gulf War was his final and most visible vindication. He had staked his reputation on the belief that the SAS could make a strategic difference and he had been proven right in the most public way possible.

 His memoirs published in the years after the war detailed the resistance he had faced from Schwartzkov and others and the quiet satisfaction he felt when the results spoke for themselves. Deabilier never claimed personal credit for what the men on  the ground had achieved. He simply said that he had known what they were capable of because he had once been one of them and all he had done was make sure they got the chance to prove it.

There is an irony in the aftermath. Bravo 20, the mission that failed, became the most famous SAS operation of the war through best-selling books, while the mobile columns that actually changed the campaign remained mostly in the shadows. But within the special forces community, the real lessons were clear.

 The contrast between foot patrol and mobile column became a case study taught at militarymies around the world. It showed that even the best soldiers can fail if the plan does not match the terrain and that flexibility matters more than bravery alone. The broader transformation was not just tactical. It was philosophical.

The Gulf War SAS campaign proved that in modern warfare, the most expensive technology in the world can be matched or even beaten by a small number of people who are selected, trained, and trusted to think for themselves. The coalition had stealth bombers, satellite surveillance, precision guided munitions, and an intelligence apparatus that spanned the globe.

And yet,  when the Scud crisis threatened to tear the Alliance apart, the solution came from men in Land Rovers with machine guns and map cases when navigating by the stars. That is not a failure of technology. It is a reminder that technology serves the people who use it, not the other way around. The SAS would face harder questions in later conflicts about accountability, about oversight, about the cost of operating in the shadows.

 But in the western desert of Iraq in 1991, the results were undeniable. They succeeded not because they had better equipment than everyone else. In many cases, their equipment was worse. They succeeded because they had been selected through one of the most brutal training programs in military history.

 A process designed not to teach skills, but to reveal character. The regiment does not train men to follow orders in perfect conditions. It selects men who can make decisions when there are no orders, no communications, and no one coming to help. And that is what being built different really means. The men who went into the western desert were cold, tired, scared, and often unsure of what they would find over the next ridge.

What made them different was not the absence of fear. It was the ability to function inside it. To keep moving when every instinct said stop, to make clear decisions when the situation was anything but clear, to trust the man beside you with your life and know that he was trusting you with his. War strips everything down to one truth.

And the truth of the western desert was this. When the radios went silent and the headquarters fell away and the night stretched out in every direction with nothing but darkness and enemies in it, the only thing that mattered was the quality of the person standing next to you.

 The SAS had spent 40 years making sure that person was the best they could find. In January 1991, in the frozen emptiness of Western Iraq, that investment paid for itself a thousand times

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *